About Me

Name: PFOX
Email: PFOX_News@verizon.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Ex-Gay Is OK!

What is PFOX?


Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays (PFOX) is a national non-profit organization that supports families, advocates for the ex-gay community, and educates the public on sexual orientation. PFOX’s statement of principles is found at www.pathinfo.org
PFOX promotes an inclusive environment for the ex-gay community, and works to eliminate negative perceptions and discrimination against former homosexuals. PFOX conducts public education and outreach to further individual self-determination and respect for all Americans, regardless of their sexual orientation. Please join us in our journey for truth, tolerance, and understanding.


Who are PFOX families?


PFOX families love their homosexual child unconditionally. Unlike other organizations which insist that parental love is conditional on affirming homosexual behavior, there are no conditions on our love for our children. We do not have to approve of everything our children do. Blanket approval is not responsible parenting or love. True love is loving in spite of our differences and treating each other with kindness and respect.


Aren’t some people born gay?


We have all heard of individuals who entered homosexuality later in life after marrying and having children with an opposite-sex spouse. No scientific evidence has established a genetic cause for homosexuality or found a “gay gene.” There is no medical or DNA test to determine if a person is homosexual. Sexual orientation is a matter of self-affirmation and public declaration. “Gay” is a self-chosen identity to publicly demonstrate an individual’s conformity with homosexual behavior and ideology.

According to the American Psychiatric Association, there are no replicated scientific studies to support that people can be born “gay” or that homosexuality is innate. And according to the American Psychological Association, “…no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that both nature and nurture both play complex roles…” (2008)


Who are ex-gays?


Each year thousands of men and women with unwanted same-sex attractions make the personal decision to leave a gay identity via secular therapy, faith based ministries, and other non-judgmental environments. Their decision is one only they can make. However, there are others in society who refuse to respect individual self-determination. Consequently, formerly gay men and women are reviled simply because they dare to exist. Without PFOX, former homosexuals would have no voice in an increasingly hostile environment.


What is the ex-gay movement?


Former homosexuals are the last invisible minority group in America. The ex-gay movement ensures the safety and inclusion of former homosexuals in all realms of society, and supports the ex-gay community’s equal access to all public venues. Ex-gays and their supporters should not have to be closeted for fear of other’s negative reactions or disapproval. They do not think something is wrong with them because they decided to fulfill their heterosexual potential. Nor do they believe others should condemn them for the personal decision they have made for their lives.


What are some of the discriminatory actions against ex-gays and their friends?


Due to media indifference, many Americans are unaware of the widespread intolerance practiced against those who leave homosexuality:

  • Unlike gay groups, ex-gay groups like PFOX are routinely denied equal access to participate in public school events, donate books to public school libraries, and present speakers on diversity day.

  • Transgenders and cross-dressers are affirmed for changing their gender but former homosexuals are ridiculed for making the decision to change their sexual orientation.

  • Ex-gay conferences and seminars across the country are frequently picketed by anti-ex-gay protestors like PFLAG, a parents organization run by a gay activist, and Soulforce, a gay religious organization.

  • Presidential candidate Barack Obama was criticized by gay activists for allowing ex-gay gospel singer Donnie McClurkin to sing at a fundraiser. They insisted that Obama drop the African-American singer from the program. Gay singers did not receive this treatment.

  • Harvard University conducted two separate investigations against employee Larry Houston because he discussed his former homosexuality on campus.

  • Equality Virginia demanded that Washington DC Metro remove PFOX’s subway billboards advocating tolerance for ex-gays.

  • An ex-gay volunteer staffing PFOX’s exhibit booth at the Arlington County,
    Virginia Fair was physically assaulted because he refused to recant his ex-gay testimony.
  • Wayne Besen, a former spokesperson for the Human Rights Campaign, falsely reported that the assault had never occurred.

  • After speaking at an ex-gay conference, Michelle McKinney-Hammond lost her programming on a broadcast station because a gay activist had complained to the station.

  • Larry Dombrowski, an employee with the Federal Aviation Administration, was suspended without pay and reassigned because he talked about former homosexuals with other employees.


The list is endless because every day brings new hostile acts against the ex-gay community. This irrational phobia of those who have overcome unwanted same-sex attractions perpetuates misunderstanding and harm against the ex-gay community. It also demonstrates a disregard for diversity and a refusal to respect a basic human right to dignity and self-determination.


Why do gays hate ex-gays so much?


Gay activist organizations instruct their members to reject ex-gays and homosexuals who refuse to self-identify as "gay." This rejection is a form of heterophobia that can be overcome with education and outreach. Gay activists cannot claim sympathy as victims when they victimize their own. We should all be tolerant of each other regardless of our sexual orientation.

The demonization of ex-gays by gays themselves is a sad end to the long struggle for tolerance by the gay community. That ex-gays and their supporters are now oppressed by the same people who until recently were victimized themselves, demonstrates how far the gay rights movement has come. Indeed, a new chapter in the movement has begun – the right of homosexuals and lesbians to leave unwanted homosexuality.


Why would anyone choose to leave homosexuality when there is so much discrimination against the ex-gay community?


Because of the abuse heaped upon them by society, former homosexuals experience discrimination at every level. When a former homosexual marries an opposite sex partner, that ex-gay is ridiculed by former friends. Ex-gays find heterosexuals also reject them if their past is known because "Once gay, always gay" is assumed. While gays can come out of the "closet," ex-gays are forced to stay in theirs because of public prejudice. While gays gain sympathy as victims, ex-gays are criticized and face life-long intolerance for simply existing as living proof that homosexuality is not innate. Americans need to face the real issue of bigotry -- oppression of ex-gays.


Do gay activists oppose the efforts of PFOX to protect the equal rights of ex-gays?


They shouldn’t. Although gay organizations advocate for the rights of homosexuals, lesbians, bisexuals, and transgenders, transsexuals, the intersexed, and questioning youth, they do not add ‘ex-gay’ to that list. Yet the addition of ex-gays ensures tolerance for all segments of our society.

Many ex-gays are afraid to come out of the closet because of the harassment they will receive. The tactics of gay activists are to go after anyone who comes out publicly as ex-gay, force them back into the closet, and then claim that ex-gays don't exist because there aren't any out in public.

PFOX is not an anti-gay organization – we are a pro-ex-gay organization. All people should be treated with dignity. We respect the opinions of others, even if they disagree with us. Indeed, we do not ask for their approval – only their tolerance.


I’m happy being gay, so why should gays change their sexual orientation?


Change is only for those with unwanted same-sex attractions. What makes you happy may not make someone else happy because we are all individuals. Please respect other people’s decisions for their lives. Ex-gays can testify to the fact that those with unwanted homosexuality deserve the right to self-determination and happiness based on their own needs, and not the needs of others. According to the American Psychological Association, “[m]ental health organizations call on their members to respect a person’s right to self-determination.” (2008)


Do I have to dislike ex-gays if I have gay friends or family?


No! You can have friends who are gay and other friends who are ex-gay. Befriending the ex-gay community does not mean that you are being disloyal to the gay people you know and love.


What about gay teens and suicide that I’ve heard about?


Research shows that the risk of suicide decreases by 20% for each year that a person delays homosexual or bisexual self-labeling. Suicide attempts were not explained by experiences with discrimination, violence, loss of friendship, or current personal attitudes towards homosexuality. (Source: Risk Factors for Attempted Suicide in Gay and Bisexual Youth by Remafedi, Farrow, and Deisher, in Official Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Pediatrics 87: 869-875 June 1991.)

Schools should not encourage teens to self-identify as “gay” before they have matured. During adolescence, sexual attractions are fluid and do not take on permanence until early adulthood. Rather than affirming teenagers as “gay” through self-labeling, educators should affirm them as people worthy of respect and encourage teens to wait until adulthood before making choices about their sexuality. If teens are encouraged to believe that they are permanently “gay” before they have had a chance to reach adulthood, their life choices are severely restricted and can result in depression. Once a child self-identifies as “gay,” he is stuck with that label because gay activists and other heterophobic influences refuse to acknowledge that an individual can leave homosexuality.


Why should schools present ex-gay information?


Schools that address the issue of sexual orientation must present all of the facts in a fair and balanced manner. According to Public Schools and Sexual Orientation Consensus Guidelines, school officials are urged to include the viewpoints of all participants, including ex-gays and their supporters, in order to develop policies that promote fairness for all. Actions by educators to exclude some views merely because they disagree with them constitute viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment. Therefore, the ex-gay viewpoint in public schools is protected by the First Amendment and should be heard. These guidelines are endorsed by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), American Association of School Administrators, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, and the First Amendment Center. In addition, the National Educators Association (NEA) Ex-Gay Educators Caucus endorses ex-gay equal access to schools.


How do sexual orientation laws and hate crime policies discriminate against ex-gays?


Ex-gays are subject to an increasingly hostile environment where they are labeled as perpetrators of hate and discrimination against homosexuals simply because they advocate for or live out a different view of homosexuality.

Gay activists have created an environment where anyone who does not accept homosexuality as equivalent to heterosexuality in every way is labeled a “bigot” whose attitude equates to racism. Consequently, alternatives to homosexuality are interpreted as harassment “against” gays. Sexual orientation non-discrimination laws and hate crime policies are used to silence the ex-gay community and legitimize intolerance against former homosexuals. Fighting “hate” and “discrimination” against gays has become a euphemism for attacks against ex-gays and their supporters. For example:

  • Davis Ott of Madison, Wisconsin was charged with a hate crime because he stated his own experience as a former homosexual.

  • The Gay, Lesbian and Straight Educational Network (GLSEN) distributed a booklet to every public school superintendent accusing former homosexuals of “harassment” because ex-gay groups want the same access to public schools that gay groups currently enjoy.

  • Cornelius Baker, executive director of the Whitman Walker AIDS clinic, labeled ex-gays as “political extremists” who “tortured and brainwashed” teens, although he endorses gay outreach to questioning youth.

  • After receiving “threats, insults and brutal letters” for running an advertisement for an ex-gay book, Psychology Today editor Bob Epstein acknowledged the “dark, intolerant, abusive side of the gay community.”

  • Orlando Commissioner Patty Sheehan denounced her fellow commissioner for issuing a proclamation honoring an ex-gay organization even though she herself freely makes proclamations celebrating “Gay Days” every year at Disney World. Ms. Sheehan, an open lesbian, went so far as to compare the ex-gay organization to the KKK, thereby demeaning African-American ex-gays.

  • Former homosexual men and women, as well as their friends and family, feel threatened because they are subjected to a hostile environment if they publicly claim their former homosexuality or support of the ex-gay community. Courageous men and women who have left their gay identity must not be denied their Constitutional rights. To give sexual orientation protection to one group while excluding another is outright discrimination.



Why must ex-gays be included in sexual orientation topics?


Ex-gays must be included in the formation of public policy because we have much to contribute to the understanding of sexual orientation. Without testimony from all sectors of society, public policy on this issue is seriously flawed.

Copyright © PFOX www.pfox.org
Tags: gay   ex-gay  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae Give Tens of Thousands of Dollars to Gay Agenda

News Advisory: December 19, 2008

Contact: Regina Griggs, Director, Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays (PFOX) 804-453-4737 PFOX@pfox.org

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Bankrupt mortgage giants Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae give thousands to homosexual groups

As mortgage giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae hurtled to financial ruin, their charitable foundations continued to pour big money into homosexual causes. 

Their largest single gifts came in the last year — just months before both companies collapsed and were taken over by the government. 

Freddie Mac gave more than $20,000 to the 2008 fundraising gala of the Washington, D.C., chapter of Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG-DC). Fannie Mae gave between $10,000 - $19,000 to the same event. 

According to its records, the Freddie Mac Foundation gave over $125,000 to gay-activist groups since 2005. The Fannie Mae Foundation donated about $80,000 to these groups over the last decade. 

Both foundations gave money to PFLAG-DC for years. 

Regina Griggs, executive director of Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays (PFOX), said, "We support individuals' rights to self-determination. We support families who have homosexual loved ones. We support those who have come out of homosexuality. We provide outreach and educate teens on same-sex attractions." 

To Freddie and Fannie, Griggs says, "We would like equal money. We want the same financial opportunity that gay groups enjoy." 

Shawn Flaherty, a spokeswoman for Freddie Mac, said she was not sure PFOX would meet the grant guidelines, adding the foundation focuses on three priorities — stable homes, foster care and adoption, and youth development. 

The grants have not focused on the gay community, she said. "It's a piece of it." 

Yet the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the nation's largest gay lobby group, also benefited from the generosity of the government sponsored mortgage giants. During the last two years, Freddie Mac gave $65,000 to HRC to help homosexual couples adopt children. 

Fannie Mae has sponsored at least five Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) events for a total of nearly $40,000 since 1998. GLADD’s purpose is to pressure the media to positively portray homosexuality and censor positive portrayals of ex-gays. 

Griggs said the process seems agenda-driven: “PFLAG, GLAAD and HRC are gay-activist groups that oppose the civil rights of the ex-gay community.” 

Representative Barney Frank (D-MA), the openly gay congressman who chairs the Housing Banking Committee charged with oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has received more than $40,000 in campaign donations from Fannie and Freddie since 1989. Frank’s former boyfriend, Herb Moses, was an executive at Fannie Mae from 1991 to 1998 -- the same time Frank was serving on the Committee. In 2003, Frank rejected warnings about the soundness of both Fannie and Freddie as exaggerations and conjuring. 

For now, all grants are under review. 

### 

Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays (PFOX)promotes an inclusive environment for the ex-gay community, and works to eliminate negative perceptions and discrimination against former homosexuals.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Black Woman Fights Back

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=82453

Saturday, December 06, 2008


LAW OF THE LAND
WorldNetDaily


Homosexuality editorial puts 1st Amendment on trial

Woman sues after she was fired for saying being 'gay' is not same as being black


Crystal Dixon

A woman is suing the university where she worked for firing her over a privately written newspaper commentary expressing her Christian views on homosexuality.

Crystal Dixon, the former associate vice president of human resources at the University of Toledo, was fired in May after she objected to an opinion article in the Toledo Free Press that compared striving for "gay rights" with the civil rights struggles of black Americans.

Dixon responded with a Free Press editorial of her own, written not in her capacity as a university employee but as a private citizen.

"As a Black woman," Dixon wrote, "I take great I take great umbrage at the notion that those choosing the homosexual lifestyle are 'civil rights victims.' Here's why. I cannot wake up tomorrow and not be a black woman. I am genetically and biologically a black woman and very pleased to be so as my Creator intended."

University of Toledo President Lloyd Jacobs immediately suspended Dixon and condemned her statements. Within days, Dixon was fired.

Now, with the help of the Thomas More Law Center, a not-for-profit law firm dedicated to the defense and promotion of the religious freedom of Christians, Dixon has today filed a lawsuit in Federal District Court claiming violations of her constitutional rights of free speech.

"Crystal Dixon has a constitutional right to privately express her personal opinions," said Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of the Law Center, in a statement.

"This particular opinion represents the view of a majority of Christian Americans," Thompson continued. "Essentially she was fired for being a Christian."

According to the Free Press, the University of Toledo's media relations policy does not specify whether faculty and staff may submit opinion pieces to the media.

"Supreme Court decisions remind us, that the fact you are a public employee doesn't mean you give up your First Amendment rights," Floyd Weatherspoon, a professor at Capital University Law School in Columbus, told the newspaper. "The majority of her column is about her personal views."

Weatherspoon said courts are usually supportive of employees in First Amendment cases, citing Pickering v. Board of Education, in which the Supreme Court ruled school officials had violated a teacher's free speech rights by censuring him after he criticized them in a newspaper editorial.

The chain of events in Dixon's case was launched by Toledo Free Press Editor in Chief Michael S. Miller's column boasting of his support for the "gay" community.

"I have been tangentially immersed in the gay culture for so long, it's a natural and common aspect of life. Three decades of loving these friends and family and sharing their successes in managing careers and raising families has jaded me to the hatred and prejudice many people had against the gay community. … As a middle-aged, overweight white guy with graying facial hair, I am America's ruling demographic, so the gay rights struggle is something I experience secondhand, like my black friends' struggles and my wheelchair-bound friends' struggles," he wrote.

He then wrote about moderating a town hall meeting sponsored by two homosexual activists groups.

It dealt "with issues of employment discrimination against gay people," he said. According to the panelists, he continued, "UT has offered domestic partner benefits since then-president Dan Johnson signed them into effect. The Medical University of Ohio did not offer those benefits. When the institutions merged, UT employees retained the domestic-partner benefits, but MUO employees were not offered them. So, people working for the same employer do not have access to the same benefits."

Dixon then responded.

"I respectfully submit a different perspective for Miller and Toledo Free Press readers to consider. … First, human beings, regardless of their choices in life, are of ultimate value to God and should be viewed the same by others. At the same time, one's personal choices lead to outcomes either positive or negative," she said.

"As a black woman who happens to be an alumnus of the University of Toledo's Graduate School, an employee and business owner, I take great umbrage at the notion that those choosing the homosexual lifestyle are 'civil rights victims.' Here's why. I cannot wake up tomorrow and not be a black woman. I am genetically and biologically a black woman and very pleased to be so as my Creator intended. Daily, thousands of homosexuals make a life decision to leave the gay lifestyle evidenced by the growing population of PFOX (Parents and Friends of Ex Gays) and Exodus International just to name a few."

WND also reported an author who wrote two books about homosexuality told managers at Toledo in an open letter they should praise an administrator who said being "gay" is not the same as black, not punish her.

Robert A.J. Gagnon, the author of "The Bible and Homosexual Practice: Texts and Hermeneutics" and "Homosexuality and the Bible: Two Views," said, "Ms. Dixon is absolutely right that sexual orientation is not akin to race or sex. Unlike a homosexual orientation, race and sex are 100 percent congenitally predetermined, cannot be fundamentally changed in their essence by cultural influences, and are not a primary or direct desire for behavior that is incompatible with embodied structures."

"Your suspension of Ms. Crystal Dixon, associate vice president of human resources at the University of Toledo, for rejecting a comparison between homosexuality on the one hand and being black or handicapped on the other hand constitutes, in my view, a gross injustice and an expression of the very intolerance that you claim to abhor," he wrote.

Gagnon said the closer parallels to adult-committed homosexual relations are not ethnicity or gender but, rather, adult-committed incestuous unions and adult-committed polysexual unions.

"Give America more exposure to upscale, adult-committed polygamous bonds (and adult-committed incestuous bonds) and American will learn to be more tolerant of such bonds…," he wrote. "Those who dismiss a polygamy analogy and an incest analogy on the grounds that polygamy and incest always produce 'demonstrable harm' are simply responding out of their 'polyphobia' and 'incest-phobia.' And then you can suspend people who say critical things about such relationships, once you overcome your own prejudices."

Gagnon, who holds degrees from Princeton, Harvard and Dartmouth, wrote the "Sexuality" entry for the "New Dictionary of Christian Apologetics," the same entry for the "Dictionary for Theological Interpretation of Scripture," and dozens of other such articles. He's written for "Theology Matters," "Catholic Biblical Quarterly" and "Journal of Biblical Literature."

He says the most "shameful" part of the University of Toledo's actions is that managers are shutting off any dissent.

Such actions "come out of the Stalinistic, Soviet state. This is the kind of elimination of any expression of differences of opinion [found there]," he said.
###
Tags: ex-gay  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »